Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 130 Wis. 238 - Lipscomb v. State

Lipscomb v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
5
states following
December 1945
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1945

9 state decisions

4019061910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Beach v. Hancock · State v. Herron · State v. Napper · Crow v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the weight of authority, when the state proves that a gun or revolver was pointed at a person within shooting distance with a threat or other words indicating intention to fire, the person assailed not knowing but that it is loaded, the state has made prinia facie proof that the gun or revolver is loaded and consequently a dangerous weapon.” State v. Herron, 12 Mont. 230 , 29 Pac. 819 ; State v. Cherry, 11 Ired. Law, 475 ; State v. Shepard, 10 Iowa, 126 ; Beach v. Hancock, 27 N. H. 223; Crow v. State, 41 Tex. 468 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Any person who shall assault another and shall feloni-ously rob, steal or take from his person any money or other property which may be the subject of larceny, such robber being armed with a dangerous weapon, with intent, if resisted, to kill or maim the person robbed, or being so armed, who shall wound or strike the person robbed, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison,” etc.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.