Russo v. Shaffer’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 1994
most recently cited
2 federal appellate ·
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The governmental interest in preventing blockbusting is substantial and is directly advanced by the nonsolicitation order, the goal of which could not have been as well served by an order less restrictive of commercial speech (see, Central Hudson .. .)■ “Since there is ‘a'sufficient “fit” between the legislature’s means and ends to satisfy the concerns of the First Amendment, the same “fit” is surely adequate under the applicable “rational basis” equal protection analysis’ ... Moreover, the order satisfies due process requirements since it is a legitimate response to blockbusting practices and the accompanying atmosphere of fear and panic achieved through solicitations by real estate salesmen” (Russo v. Shaffer, 131 A.D.2d 853 , 517 N.Y.S.2d 212, 213 [2d Dep’t 1987]).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“a valid exercise of the Secretary['s] ... authority to issue appropriate regulations deemed necessary to implement the legislative intent behind”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the non-solicitation order did not violate the petitioners' right to commercial free speech”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.