Norille v. State

Decided November 15, 1901

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1901-11-15

Tried before the Hon. Daniel A. Gtieene. The appellant in this case was prosecuted and convicted for presenting a pistol at another person.

Relies on Feibelman v. State · Knowles v. State · Bell v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1901-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1976

7 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

McCLELLAN, C. J.-

¶1This case was tried by the judge without a jury. It is sought by thisi appeal only ¡to have his finding and conclusion of guilt on the testimony reviewed. The facts were not agreed upon, nor was there any special finding of them nor request for such finding. On this state of case the conclusion of the judge stands as a verdict of a jury, and cannot be revised by this court. — Bell v. State, 75 Ala. 25; Knowles v. State, 80 Ala. 9; Wright v. State, 29 So. Rep. 864; Fiebelman v. State, 130 Ala. 122.

¶2Affirmed.