Joost v. Craig’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 1981 · most notably State ex rel. Matter v. John Ogden & American Surety Co. (1915), 106 Cal. App. 3d 365 - Garton v. Title Insurance & Trust Co. (1980)
2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oakland Bank of Savings v. Murfey · People v. Lundin · State ex rel. Kleinsorge v. Meyer · State ex rel. Covenant Mutual Life Insurance v. Balmer · Jones v. Bach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the deed is not genuine, but is false, the notary and his sureties ought to be held for all damages, unless they have taken the precautions expressly required by statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that the person making such acknowledgment is the person who is described in and who executed the instrument.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.