131 Cal. App. 177 - People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
1933
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably 69 Cal. App. 2d 503 - People v. Chait (1945), People v. Breyer (1934)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mack v. Jastro · Smith v. Mathews · 88 Cal. App. 575 - People v. Plum · 128 Cal. App. 556 - Jewett v. City Transfer & Storage Co. · 106 Cal. App. 442 - People v. Leach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Finally, respondent suggests that an application of the provisions of section 4% of article VI of the Constitution indicates that the judgment herein should be affirmed. By one of the terms of section 1110 of the Penal Code it is provided that a defendant cannot be convicted, ‘unless the pretense is proven by the testimony of two witnesses, or that of one witness and corroborating circumstances; . . .’ From a consideration of such provision, together with the evidence adduced on the trial, it will become apparent that to give effect to the constitutional provision invoked by the respondent would require either that this court ignore at least that part of the statute to which attention has been directed, or that it invade the province of the jury in its legally exclusive right to pass upon the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the several witnesses. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Katcher“object or purpose of the quasi-repealing statute is identical with that of the statute to be so repealed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wiese v. Becerra
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.