Daugherty v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1984
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClung v. Watt · Freeman v. Dowling · Mills v. Brown · 115 Cal. App. 2d 854 - Gottesfeld v. Richmaid Ice Cream Co. · 57 Cal. App. 2d 637 - Kraft v. Innis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where an action is properly brought in a county in which one of the defendants resides, it may be retained notwithstanding there is a dismissal of the resident defendant, provided the following exists the action was begun in good faith in the bona fide belief that plaintiff had a cause of action against the resident defendant; the joinder of the local defendant was not fraudulent or frivolous, with the intention of depriving the non-resident defendant of his right to be sued in his own county; and there was a reasonable claim of liability asserted against the resident defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vance v. Minton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.