Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 CALAPP2D 669 - People v. Vera

People v. Vera’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
September 1978
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 1978

5 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

110195519601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 66 Cal. App. 2d 166 - People v. Zammora · 109 Cal. App. 2d 524 - People v. Burns · Anderson v. Souza · 112 Cal. App. 2d 574 - People v. Sica · Pacific Coast Elevator Co. v. Department of Public Works

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In the instant case a rough transcript was made by a reporter, Sergeant Floution then took it, listened to the recording, and supplied portions which were lacking in the rough draft. The rough draft, being a document prepared under the Sergeant’s direction, fully met the requirements of. section 2047 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and it was proper for him to use it. at the trial to refresh his recollection of the conversation. “Appellant’s contention that if the document was used to-refresh the present memory of the witness, the latter should have referred to the writing and then testified, independent of the memorandum — as of his own personal recollection, is answered by the court in People v. Brown, 3 Cal.App. 178, 179 , 84 P. 670, 671 , wherein it is said: ‘And the rule is not different, where the witness has a copy of the original in his hands, which he has compared, and swears that the same is an exact copy of' the original memorandum.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.