First Nat. Bank v. State Nat. Bank’s Empirical Analysis
131 F. 430 · 1904
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1947
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hovey v. McDonald · The Lottawanna · Ensminger v. Powers · Fisher v. Cushman · In re Rouse, Hazard & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The general consensus of opinion is that, section 25a having provided a means to review by appeal three kinds of judgments, every other means is excluded.’’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Simpson v. Macomber
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.