Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

131 F.2d 1023

Docket No. 8098.

Kriesak v. Crowe

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dee. 8, 1942.

Decided Dec. 17, 1942.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1942-12-17

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kriesak v. Crowe

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1942-12-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1976

2 federal appellate ·

201942195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Edward J. Kelly, of Scranton, Pa. (Forrest J. Mervine, of Stroudsburg, Pa., and Kelly, Fitzgerald & Kelly, of Scranton, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

¶2Henry Thomas Dolan, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

¶3Before MARIS, JONES, and GOODRICH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon this appeal the sole question is whether there was sufficient evidence that the injuries to the plaintiff’s decedent resulted from the negligence of the defendant to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiff. We have carefully examined the evidence, the recital of which here would serve no useful purpose, and we are satisfied that the district court was right in holding it sufficient to support the verdict. It follows that the court committed no error in denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for judgment in his favor.

¶6The judgment, 44 F.Supp. 636, is affirmed.

/131/f2d/1023 · .json · Public domain