Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 F.2d 261 - United States v. Tot

United States v. Tot’s Empirical Analysis

131 F.2d 261 · 1942

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2015 · most notably Tot v. United States (1943), 70 Cal. 2d 851 - Galvan v. Superior Court (1969)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 11 state decisions

9019421950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 901 · 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on Agnello v. United States · United States v. Carolene Products Co. · Marron v. United States · United States v. Darby · United States v. Lefkowitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was regulated by statute as to time and place as far back as the Statute of Northhampton in 1328 and on many occasions since.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is abundantly clear . . . that this amendment [was adopted] . . . as a protection for the States in the maintenance of their militia organizations against possible encroachments by the federal power.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.