¶1Martin Gendel, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
¶2Nat Rosin, of Los Angeles, Cal., for ap-pellee Francis F. Quittner.
¶3David C. Levenson and Kenneth E. Matot, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for ap-pellee Floyd' C. Balding.
¶4Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.
¶6On a petition filed June 18, 1940, appellant was adjudged a voluntary bankrupt. The case was referred to a referee, a trustee was appointed and, on February 18, 1941, the trustee and Floyd C. Balding, a creditor of appellant, filed an objection to his discharge. The referee, after hearing the objection, entered an order denying the discharge. From an order affirming the referee’s order this appeal is prosecuted.
¶7Appellant contends (1) that the objection stated no facts warranting a denial of his discharge and (2) that there was no evidence warranting such denial.
¶8The objection stated, in substance, that in June, 1940 — a time subsequent to the first day of the twelve months immediately preceding the filing of his petition in bankruptcy — appellant had concealed certain of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. That was a sufficient ground for denying appellant’s discharge. Bankruptcy Act, § 14, sub. c, 11 U.S.C.A. § 32, sub. c.1
¶9Upon the hearing of the objection, the objectors (the trustee and Balding) produced evidence which showed to the satisfaction of the court that there were reasonable grounds for believing that in July, 1939 — a time subsequent to the first day of the twelve months immediately preceding the filing of his petition in bankruptcy — appellant had transferred and concealed certain of his property with intent to defraud his creditors. Thus, the burden of proving that he had not done so devolved upon appellant.2 The burden was not sustained. Appellant offered no proof whatever.
¶10Order affirmed.