Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 F.3d 1141 - Able v. Bacarisse

Able v. Bacarisse’s Empirical Analysis

131 F.3d 1141 · 1998

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 2017

3 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Melancon · United States v. Mendiola

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the right to appeal is a statutory right, not a constitutional right”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.