Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 F.3d 1289 - Walthall

Walthall’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
March 2017
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably Danny Padilla William Neary v. Danny Padilla (2000), In Re Dennis Leroy Saxman (2003)

10 federal appellate ·

190199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft · Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he statute is not susceptible only to the [appellant's] interpretation; the IRS's interpretation... is reasonable. We must therefore show the IRS interpretation substantial deference.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the need to avoid piecemeal litigation; (2) judicial efficiency; (3) the systemic interest in preserving the bankruptcy court's role as the finder of fact; and (4) whether delaying review would cause either party irreparable harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he statute is not susceptible only to the [taxpayers'] interpretation . . . the IRS's interpretation . . . is reasonable”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.