Adelson v. Dipaola’s Empirical Analysis
131 F.3d 259 · 1997
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 45 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Fortini v. Murphy (2001), Figueroa v. Rivera (1998)
17 federal appellate · 45 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Estelle v. McGuire · Rose v. Lundy · Picard v. Connor · Schad v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a habeas petitioner bears a heavy burden to show that he fairly and recognizably presented to the state courts the factual and legal bases of this federal claim-To carry this burden, the petitioner must demonstrate that he tendered each claim in such a way as to make it probable that a reasonable jurist would have been alerted to the existence of the federal question.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“will not entertain an application for habeas relief unless the petitioner first has fully exhausted his state remedies in respect to each and every claim contained within the application.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dame v. Goguen · Martinez v. Ryan“[T]he decisive pleading [under Massachusetts practice] is the application for further appellate review, and we must determine whether the petitioner fairly presented the federal claim to the SJC within `the four corners' of that application.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.