Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 F.3d 353 - College Savings Bank 97-5055 Dc v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board College Savings Bank Dc

College Savings Bank 97-5055 Dc v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board College Savings Bank Dc’s Empirical Analysis

131 F.3d 353 · 1997

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 2019
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019 · most notably College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board (1999), Sacred Heart Hospital v. Pennsylvania (1998)

13 federal appellate · 5 district ·

320199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · Paul v. Davis · Brown et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka et al. · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If a state’s conduct impacting on a business always implicated the Fourteenth Amendment, Congress would have almost unrestricted power to subject states to suit' through the exercise of its abrogation power. Congress could pass any law that tangentially affected the ability of businesses to operate and then create causes of action against the states in federal court if they infringed on those federally created rights. This result would be unacceptable and would conflict directly with the strict limits on Congress’s powers to abrogate a state’s Eleventh Amendment immunity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “partakes of the nature of a jurisdictional bar,” College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Ed. Expense Bd., 131 F.3d 353, 365 (3d Cir.1997), the Eleventh Amendment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “since Seminole Tribe section five of the Fourteenth Amendment has been the sole basis for Congress to abrogate the states' immunity under the Eleventh Amendment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.