¶1 Harvey E. Tunstall appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss Tunstall’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Tunstall v. Cutler, No. CA-04-89-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED