131 F. Supp. 2d 942 - Thomas v. Halter’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · United States v. Dunkel · Mullen v. Bowen · Telespectrum, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Kentucky · 14547b Conn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is not required to articulate all of the reasons it rejects a party's objections.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Logan v. Casino
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.