Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 Idaho 56 - State v. Sherrod

State v. Sherrod’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2020

14 state decisions

701998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ashe v. Swenson · Schiro Farley Superintendent Indiana State Prison et al · State v. Windsor · State v. McMahan · State v. Cariaga

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In order for the defendant to be guilty of Lewd and Lascivious Conduct, the state must prove each of the following: 1. On or about or between January 1997 and March 2000, 2. in the state of Idaho 3. the defendant, CHARLES G. MONTOYA, committed an act of manual-genital contact or oral-genital contact or genital-genital contact or any other lewd or lascivious act upon or with the body of [C.H.], 4. [C.H.] was a child under sixteen (16) years of age, and 5. the defendant committed such act with the specific intent to arouse, appeal to, or gratify the lust or passions or sexual desires of either of them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A person commits aggravated battery who, in committing battery: (a)Causes great bodily harm, permanent disability or permanent disfigurement; or (b) Uses a deadly weapon or instrument; or (c) Uses any vitriol, corrosive acid, or a caustic chemical of any nature; or (d) Uses any poison or other noxious or destructive substance or liquid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.