131 Ill. App. 3d 128 - People v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
102 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably 207 Ill. 2d 68 - People v. Moore (2003), 147 Ill. 2d 173 - People v. Williams (1991)
102 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 102 Ill. 2d 181 - People v. Krankel · 13 Ill. 2d 290 - The People v. Coulson · 85 Ill. 2d 241 - People of Illinois v. Rhodes · 63 Ill. 2d 443 - People v. Nichols · 98 Ill. App. 3d 228 - People v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial court should examine the factual matters underlying the defendant’s claim. *** If the claim goes to matters of trial tactics or strategy, the defendant’s claim should be found spurious and his request for new counsel denied. This was the case in Johnson. If, however, the factual matters show possible neglect of the defendant’s case, the court should appoint new counsel who can undertake an independent evaluation of the defendant’s claim and present the matter to the court from a detached, yet adversarial, position. This was the case in Krankel, where defendant alleged that his attorney failed to interview an alibi witness.” Jackson, 131 Ill. App. 3d at 139 .”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The reason for appointment of new counsel [in a post-trial motion hearing] is that the original trial attorney would generally be under a conflict of interest were he called upon to justify his actions in the case.” (131 Ill. App. 3d at 138, 474 N.E.2d at 474 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.