Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 IND 347 - Fowler v. Wallace

Fowler v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
4
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Sievers v. Peters Box & Lumber Co. (1898), Keeshin Motor Express Co. v. Glassman (1942)

5 federal appellate · 47 state decisions

1001892190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Walker · People v. . Briggs · Elliott v. Van Buren · Continental Insurance v. Jachnichen · Commonwealth v. Tenney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is probably true that there are cases where the rule stated should not apply, but the case before us is a close one upon the evidence, and we are unable to escape the conclusion that the trial court by so often repeating the doctrine so broadly and strongly stated imposed a greater burden upon the appellant than the law requires him to bear.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The authorities are well agreed upon the proposition that the intention to restore, repay or replace money or property wrongfully and unlawfully appropriated does not take from the act its criminal character.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.