131 Ind. App. 623 - Ring v. Ring’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 1989
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 128 Ind. App. 475 - Siebeking v. Ford, Admx., Etc. · Piggly-Wiggly Stores, Inc. v. Lowenstein · Snow v. Sutton · United States v. Stock Yards Bank of Louisville · 131 Ind. App. 127 - Cheek v. JORDAN, D/B/A JORDAN FUNERAL HOME
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Instructions are expositions to the jury by the trial court of the principles of law applicable in the particular case, which it is bound to apply in such case, and the purpose of which is to advise the jury of the particular question or questions they are to determine and to guide them in the application of the correct principles of law to the facts before them."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Re-plevin is a possessory action, the gist or purpose of which is to determine the plaintiffs right to the possession of the property which is the object of the action and which the defendant has wrongfully taken or has wrongfully retained. ... The primary object is to recover the possession of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.