Stephenson v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ . . . which bond was conditioned, as required’ by statute (R. S. 61-1011), that defendants should not commit or suffer waste and should pay double the value of the use and occupation of the real estate from March 1, 1926, to the date of the. delivery of the premises, ...” (Stephenson v. Peterson, supra, p. 691.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Stephenson v. Peterson

2. ““Since the issues were not the same, a judgment in that case could not, of course, be res judicata. (Benz v. Hines and Tarr, 3 Kan. 390 ; A. T. & S. F. Rld. Co. v. Comm’rs of Jefferson Co., 12 Kan. 127 ; McDowell v. Gibson, 58 Kan. 607 , 50 Pac. 870 .)” (p.694.)”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Haynes Hardware Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.