Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 Ky. 330 - Duncan v. Combs

Duncan v. Combs’s Empirical Analysis

1909

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 2018

7 state decisions

20190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lafferty v. Huffman · Taylor v. Beckham · Wilson v. Hines · Sparks v. Robinson · Owensboro & Nashville Ry. Co. v. Barclay's Administrator

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the whole purpose of this statute is to prevent officers of a city from collecting from the citizens and taxpayers thereof money under a void ordinance, and the penalty imposed is both upon those who participated in the passage of such an ordinance and those who suffered the expenditure of money collected thereunder. This is the plain, unambiguous meaning of the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.