Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 MO 519 - State v. Sibley

State v. Sibley’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
6
states following
August 2005
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2005

20 state decisions

40189519001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Grant · State v. Patrick · State v. Shroyer · State v. Rider · State v. Strattman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]uch evidence is inadmissible in any case for the purpose of impeaching the character of a male witness . . . It is a matter of common knowledge that the bad character of a man for chastity does not even in the remotest degree affect his character for truth, when based upon that alone, while it does that of a woman.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.