Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 Mont. 175 - Miller v. Sutherland

Miller v. Sutherland’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
4
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 1998

2 district · 18 state decisions

8019571960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. White · Allen v. Petrick · Yardley's Estate · Welch v. All Persons · Warren v. Senecal

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Marriage is a personal relation arising out of a civil contract, to which the consent of parties capable of making it is necessary. Consent alone will not constitute marriage; it must be followed by a solemnization, or by a mutual assumption of marital rights, duties or obligations."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““When we speak of repute we mean reputation, being the character and status commonly ascribed to one’s actions by the public. The evidence in this case falls far short of establishing a reputation by appellant and respondent as being wife and husband. Instances of cohabitation and registration for living quarters in communities away from the home abode of the parties, of which the record is replete herein, can support the conclusion of meretricious relations as easily as any other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.