Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 N.C. App. 276 - State v. Davidson

131 N.C. App. 276 - State v. Davidson’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2017

16 state decisions

160199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · State v. Richardson · State v. Elliott · State v. Dobbins · 98 N.C. App. 274 - State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Any person who: (1) Offers or sells a security in violation of G.S. 78A-8(1), 78A-8(3), 78A-10(b), 78A-13, 78A-14, 78A-24, or 78A-36(a), or of any rule or order under G.S. 78A-49(d) which requires the affirmative approval of sales literature before it is used, or of any condition imposed under G.S. 78A-27(d) or 78A-28(g), or (2) Offers or sells a security by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading (the purchaser not knowing of the untruth or omission), and who does not sustain the burden of proof that he did not know, and in the exercise of reasonable care could not have known, of the untruth or omission, is liable to the person purchasing the security from him, who may sue either at law or in equity to recover the consideration paid for the security, together with interest at the legal rate from the date of payment, costs, and reasonable attorneys' fees, less the amount of any income received on the security, upon the tender of the security, or for damages if the purchaser no longer owns the security. Damages are the amount that would be recoverable upon a tender less the value of the security when the purchaser disposed of it and interest at the legal rate as provided by G.S. 24-1 from the date of disposition.... (c) (1) Every person who directly or indirectly controls a person liable under subsect”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Cases construing the federal rule are instructive when examining our statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.