131 N.C. App. 409 - Rowe v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2014
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Veazey v. City of Durham · 119 N.C. App. 730 - North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Page · 55 N.C. App. 250 - Stephenson v. Stephenson · 115 N.C. App. 423 - Moose v. Nissan of Statesville, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Postseparation support is only intended to be temporary and ceases when an award of alimony is either allowed or denied by the trial court .... Therefore, since a postseparation support order is a temporary measure, it is interlocutory . . . and it is not appealable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An order is interlocutory if it is made during the pendency of an action and does not dispose of the case but leaves further matters to be judicially determined between the parties at the trial court level.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“. . . spousal support to be paid until the earlier of either the date specified in the order of postseparation support, or an order awarding or denying alimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.