State v. Isaac M.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Dixon · Grady v. Corbin · State v. Rowell · State v. Jonathan M. · State v. Nunez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, felonious or infamous crime unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury or information filed by a district attorney or attorney general or their deputies, except in cases arising in the militia when in actual service in time of war or public danger. No person shall be so held on information without having had a preliminary examination before an examining magistrate, or having waived such preliminary examination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lopez“does not expressly limit the `power of the district attorney either to resubmit a matter to a grand jury or to proceed by information after a grand jury has returned a no[-] bill'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Follin“to scrutinize charging decisions in limited appropriate cases that seek to circumvent... constitutional safeguards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rendleman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.