Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 N.M. 350 - Subin v. Ulmer

Subin v. Ulmer’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Quintana v. Schnedar

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the constitutional right is clear and the statutory law [i.e., the Indigent Defense Act and the Public Defender Act] is honestly open to interpretation, the courts have an obligation to act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It seems logical to me that if I can appoint a lawyer to represent a criminal defendant I should be able to insure that that lawyer can have the resources to provide that defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.