131 Ohio App. 3d 387 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
66 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions — most recently September 2025 · most notably State v. Sanchez (2005), State v. Brooks (2018)
66 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Brecksville v. Cook · 71 Ohio App. 3d 292 - State v. Logan · 113 Ohio App. 3d 606 - State v. Miller · 122 Ohio App. 3d 626 - State v. Cloud · 37 Ohio App. 3d 159 - State v. Fitch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate review of a trial court's decision on a motion to dismiss for a violation of the speedy trial requirements presents a mixed question of law and fact.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brooks · State v. Mathews“Appellate courts then independently determine whether the trial court properly applied the law to the facts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brooks · State v. Mathews“Where the warden fails to inform the prisoner, the state cannot rely upon the defendant's failure to make a demand for speedy disposition, but must start the one hundred eighty day time period from the day of the indictment. * * * However, where the defendant is fully aware of the charges pending against him, the fact that he was not notified by the warden does not excuse his duty to trigger the running of his speedy trial rights under R.C. 2941.401.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.