State v. Linn’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “307 Or. 152 , 154 n. 2, 764 P.2d 920 (1988). Although the Supreme Court noted that the voters' pamphlet failed to inform the voters about the proposed deletion, it expressed no conclusion about the significance of the omission. Defendant urges us to continue to recognize the prohibition against use of municipal court or justice court convictions to attack the credibility of a witness, because the omission indicates that the voters had”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lin

2. “no intent to reverse the 1981 Legislature's decision to prohibit use of justice court or municipal court convictions for impeachment under Rule 609(1).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lin

3. “The problem created by that initiative was succinctly stated by the Supreme Court in State v. Gallant:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Lin