Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 SCT 1910 - Brown v. Plata

Brown v. Plata’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

147
cited by 147 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

53 federal appellate · 14 district · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1253 · 28 U.S.C. § 2284

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Bell v. Wolfish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 147 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts may not allow constitutional violations to continue simply because a remedy would involve intrusion into the realm of prison administration.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As a consequence of their own actions, prisoners may be deprived of rights that are fundamental to liberty. Yet the law and the Constitution demand recognition of certain other rights. Prisoners retain the essence of human dignity inherent in all persons. Respect for that dignity animates the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The basic concept underlying the Eighth Amendment is nothing less than the dignity of man.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Prospective relief in any civil action with respect to prison conditions shall extend no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right of a particular plaintiff or plaintiffs. The court shall not grant or approve any prospective relief unless the court finds that such relief is narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right, and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.