131 So. 3d 1198 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 772 So. 2d 1010 - Adams v. State · 961 So. 2d 70 - Rayborn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Williams has offered no evidence to show he was “unfairly surprised” by the amendment or that he was unable to present a defense. Furthermore, since an amendment charging a defendant as a habitual offender does not affect the substance of the crime charged, but only the sentencing, Williams’s defense to the sale-of-cocaine charge was unaffected by the amendment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“Whether the circuit court erred in granting the State’s motion to amend the indictment to charge Williams as a recidivist.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.