Massey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Blackledge v. Allison · Sellers v. Sanders · Vielee v. State · Myers v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Massey’s written plea petition -states the factual basis for his guilty plea. It provides, in relevant part: My lawyer advises me and I understand that the charge to which I am pleading guilty in cause/count number 2010-483/2 is. aggravated assault. The elements of that crime are that I did willfully, unlawfully, feloniously, [and] knowingly attempt to cause bodily injury to Ande Daniel by shooting at him with a deadly weapon[,] a firearm. [[Image here]] In his plea colloquy, Massey testified: [[Image here]] THE COURT: Have- you been unduly influenced, pressured,- • intimidated, threatened, forced, coerced or promised any hope of reward to plead guilty, Mr. Massey? DEFENDANT: No, sir, THE COURT: Who made the decision to enter the plea of guilty in your case, Mr. Massey?- . DEFENDANT: I did. THE COURT: Are you absolutely sure, Mr. Massey? DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. Yes, sir.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Massey also contends an officer of the court falsified court documents by altering the date of his plea bargain. He lists this issue as number four in his brief. However, Massey made no mention of such alteration in his motion. We have consistently held, “If a prisoner fails to raise all of his claims in his original petition for post-conviction relief, those claims will be procedurally barred if the petitioner seeks to bring them for the first time on appeal to this Court.” Willis v. State, 17 So.3d 1162, 1166 (¶ 15) (Miss.Ct.App.2009) (citing Rivers v. State, 807 So.2d 1280, 1281 (¶ 5) (Miss.Ct.App.2002)). Because Massey failed to raise this issue before the trial court, he cannot argue it here. Therefore, this issue is procedurally barred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Massey v. State“Massey was fully informed of the State’s evidence and Sessums’s potential testimony when he pled guilty. Massey swore in court, and in his written plea, that he agreed with the State’s allegations against him, he was satisfied with his counsel, and he had no complaints with either attorney’s advice. Massey’s second counsel effectively negotiated a deal with the State that eliminated one charge and reduced his prospective prison sentence by nearly fifty years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Massey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.