131 So. 3d 197 - State v. Hamdan’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Arizona v. Fulminante · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · California v. Green
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n-evaluating a defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of evidence, we are restricted to those theories of defense actually put forward to the trier of fact. See State v. Juluke, 98-0341, pp. 4-5 (La.1/8/99), 725 So.2d 1291, 1293-1294 (per curiam). In other words, a defendant may not develop a new theory on appeal and demonstrate that the circum stantial evidence was insufficient to negate the new theory. Id.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.