Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 SW2D 1012 - Joy v. Peacock

Joy v. Peacock’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
February 1976
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1976

3 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

3019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc. · Dunn v. Second National Bank of Houston · 11 Tex. Civ. App. 186 - Phipps v. P. J. Willis & Bro. · Stone v. Morrison · Armour Packing Co. v. Vinegar Bend Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “communications between parties, germane to the issues pleaded and raised, are always admissible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.