Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 SW2D 663 - Clark v. Stubbs

Clark v. Stubbs’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1997

9 state decisions

401939194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bassel v. Shanklin · Linger v. Balfour · Trimmier v. Carlton · McCall v. Lewis · McCharen v. Mead

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * This is an election contest. It is not a civil suit, and the constitutionality of the statute cannot be attacked in this sort of proceeding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.