Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 SW3D 375 - State v. Marshall

State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Goddard v. Forrest

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must attempt to present the excluded evidence at trial, and if an objection to the proposed evidence is raised and sustained, the proponent must then make an offer of proof.” State v. Marshall, 131 S.W.3d 375, 377 (Mo.App.E.D.2004).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.