Saenz v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 399th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Ball v. United States · Almanza v. State · Zuliani v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“undisputed facts show the double jeopardy violation is clearly apparent on the face of the record and when enforcement of usual rules of procedural default serves no legitimate state interests.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Saldana v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.