Bitterman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · United States v. Peter A. Crusco and Phillip A. Cimmino. Appeal of Phillip Cimmino · Moore v. State · United States v. Block · Zimmerman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“5 YEARS IN THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, AND A FINE OF $0.00; THE STATE NEITHER OPPOSES NOR RECOMMENDS THAT THE COURT GRANT DEFERRED ADJUDICATION PROBATION IN THIS MATTER.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bitterman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.