Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 U.S. 221 - Parker

Parker’s Empirical Analysis

131 U.S. 221 · 1889

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
12
cited 12 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
March 1944
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 6 district · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions (12 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1944 · most notably Work v. United States Rives (1925), Hudson v. Parker (1895)

25 federal appellate · 6 district · 23 state decisions — followed in 11 states

2001889189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co. · Thompson v. United States · Ex parte Morgan · People ex rel. Case v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘•The second objection is equally untenable. When the law allowed the proceeding to be taken at the chambers oí the judge of the court, it meant at the chambers where he can conveniently attend to business relating to cases in his district, not that they must necessarily be within the territorial limits of his district. As one of the judges of the territory, it is a part of his duty to sit in the Supreme Court. He is one of its members, and his chambers, ■whilst the Supreme Court is in session, and he is in attendance upon it, may be at the place where that court is sitting.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.