State v. McClendon’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Amunrud v. Board of Appeals (2006), State v. Shultz (1999)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Halper · Austin v. United States · United States v. Ursery · Breed v. Jones · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Nonpunitive sanctions might include, for example, compensatory damages, restitution, and forfeiture of stolen property for return to its rightful owner.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Shultz“The double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against multiple punishments for the same offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.