131 Wash. App. 135 - Olver v. Fowler’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 111 Wash. 2d 828 - Kreidler v. Eikenberry · 127 Wash. 2d 339 - Connell v. Francisco · 101 Wash. 2d 299 - In Re the Marriage of Lindsey · 31 Wash. 2d 345 - Creasman v. Boyle · 81 Wash. 2d 72 - In Re Estate of Thornton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“simply because of his death. [21] ¶ 20 In time, a similar equitable doctrine emerged to recognize property entitlements of partners fully aware of their unmarried status. [22] When first presented with the question, our Supreme Court ruled that in the absence of evidence to the contrary, whichever partner held title to the property would be presumed its rightful owner. [23] This rule, labeled the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olver v. Fowler“Would Washington law afford a person in Ms. Warner's situation the same status as that of a wife with respect to the intestate devolution of Sylvan Warner's personal property?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olver v. Fowler“division of such property, [10] applying community property laws by analogy. [11] All property acquired during the relationship is”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olver v. Fowler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.