131 Wis. 2d 153 - State v. Fry’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 152 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 158 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]his court has consistently and routinely conformed the law of search and seizure under the state constitution to that developed by the United States Supreme Court under the fourth amendment.”

   10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 155 Wis. 2d 537 - State v. Weide · 218 Wis. 2d 180 - State v. Phillips

2. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

   9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 155 Wis. 2d 119 - State v. DeSmidt · 155 Wis. 2d 217 - State v. Murdock

3. “"[i]t is always conceivable that the [United States] Supreme Court could interpret the fourth amendment in a way that undermines the protection Wisconsin citizens have from unreasonable searches and seizures under art. I, sec. 11, Wisconsin Constitution. This would necessitate that we require greater protection to be afforded under the state constitution than is recognized under the fourth amendment.””

   5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 144 Wis. 2d 116 - State v. Tompkins · State v. Eason