Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 131 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Smith

131 Wis. 2d 220 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
4
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 173 Wis. 2d 529 - State v. Bohling (1993), State v. Robinson (2010)

102 state decisions

40019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Brown v. Illinois · Gerstein v. Pugh · Dunaway v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hether a police officer under the circumstances known to the officer at the time [of entry] reasonably believes that delay in procuring a warrant would gravely endanger life or risk destruction of evidence or greatly enhance the likelihood of the suspect's escape.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “four factors which, when measured against the time needed to obtain a warrant, would constitute the exigent circumstances required for a warrantless entry: (1) [a]n arrest made in 'hot pursuit,' (2) a threat to safety of a suspect or others, (3) a risk that evidence would be destroyed, and (4) a likelihood that the suspect would flee.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “our laws recognize that, under special circumstances, it would be unrealistic and contrary to public policy to bar law enforcement officials at the doorstep.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.