131 Wis. 2d 405 - State v. Schael’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. · 124 Wis. 2d 628 - State v. Pitsch · 74 Wis. 2d 503 - Loveday v. State · 50 Wis. 2d 715 - Zebrowski v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Schael argues that his sentence was unduly disproportionate to the sentences imposed on the accomplices. The trial court, at sentencing, fully explained the differences in the conduct of the actors, their prior records and their relative remorse. We are unpersuaded that these are considerations not pertinent to proper sentencing discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“By the Court. -Judgment and order affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.