131 Wis. 2d 507 - Jantzen v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141
Relies on Stoll v. Gottlieb · Federal Communications Commission v. Home Box Office, Inc. · 113 Wis. 2d 112 - In Re Cherokee Park Plat · 19 Cal. 3d 165 - Levy v. Cohen · 113 Wis. 2d 306 - DePratt v. West Bend Mutual Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Application of the rule of res judicata does not depend upon actual litigation of an issue. The earlier judgment is. conclusive as to 'all matters which were litigated or which might have been litigated' in that proceeding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“An arrangement confirmed by a bankruptcy court has the effect of a judgment rendered by the district court. Miller v. Meinhard-Commercial Corporation, 462 F.2d 358, 360 (5th Cir. 1972). As such, it is a final judgment for purposes of the doctrine of res judicata. 5 Collier on Bankruptcy, sec. 1141.01 at 1141-5-6 (15th ed. 1986).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he identity of parties requirement of res judicata is met where the two actions involve a closely-held corporation in one case [here, the arbitration proceedings] and its principal shareholder in the other [Manu-Tronics II].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.