132 Ala. 10
Decided February 13, 1902
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1902-02-13
<p> Indictment for Bobbery. </p> <p>1. Reasonable doubt; individual jurqrs; charge. — In a criminal case a charge which instructs the jury that “if any individual juror is not convinced of defendant’s guilt beyond all reasonable doubt, and to a moral certainty, the jury cannot convict,” is proper, and should be given at defendant’s request.</p>
Relies on Hale v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1902-02-13
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently May 1988
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1— Charge 15 refused to the defendant is a copy of charge 7 refused to defendant in Hale v. State, 122 Ala. 85, 89, and there upon full consideration held to have been erroneously refused; and on the authority of that case, the judgment in this must be reversed.
¶2There is no merit in any of the other exceptions reserved on the trial.
¶3Eeversed and remanded.