Norris v. State

Decided February 13, 1902

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1902-02-13

<p> Indictment for Carrying Concealed Pistol. </p> <p>1. Evidence as to defendant’s ownership or possession of pistol; when immaterial. — Where the evidence for- the State tended ■ • to show that defendant carried a pistol concealed at a picnic about twelve, or one o’clock, it is immaterial whether he owned a pistol or had one about his person at his home in . the morning of that day.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1930

1 state decisions

Relies on Gaither v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1902-02-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

DOWDELL, J.

¶1— Whether the defendant owned a ¿lis-to!,' or had one about his clothing, at his home in the morning of the day, that he went to a picnic, at which latter plhce, the evidence on the part of the State tended to show a carrying by him at about twelve or one ocloek of the day, in violation of the law, was immaterial and irrelevant. The court -committed no error in sustain*13ing the State’s objection to the question calling for this evidence.—Gaither v. State, 89 Ala. 62. This is the only question presented far consideration. We find no error in the record and the judgment is 'affirmed.

¶2Affirmed.