Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 132 ALA 660 - Scott v. Brassell

Scott v. Brassell’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 1942
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1942

7 state decisions

4019021910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Kirksey · Latham v. Staples · Rainey v. Rainey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An unsworn answer when it contradicts the averments of the bill, is mere pleading, and is entitled to no more weight as evidence than the bill, but it is required still, that the allegations of the bill be sustained by proof sufficient to overcome the contradictions of the answer.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.